-TODO: add idea that elevated temperatures are considered necessary to
-deviate the system out of equilibrium, as assumed to be the case in IBS
-
-you can always add constant to energy.
-formation energies are not overestimated
-just the migration barriers are
-to increase probability of transitions, temperature is increased
-occupation of energetically more unfavorable states likewise increased
-indeed, sub conf, which is slightly higher than c-si DB, is increased
-comparing with experimental findings that suggest c sub for higher
-temperatures gives rise to the conclusion that the increased
-temperatures are needed to deviate the system out of the ground state!
-
-There is not necessarily a correlation of cohesive energies or defect
-formation energies with activation energies for migration. Cohesive
-energies are most often well described by the classical potentials
-since these are most often used to fit the potential parameters. The
-overestimated barriers, however, are due to the short range character
-of these potentials, which drop the interaction to zero within the
-first and next neighbor distance using a special cut-off function.
-Since the total binding energy is 'accommodated' within this short
-distance, which according to the universal energy relation would
-usually correspond to a much larger distance, unphysical high forces
-between two neighbored atoms arise. This is explained in detail in the
-study of Mattoni et. al. (PRB 76, 224103 (2007)).
+There is not necessarily a correlation of the cohesive and migration
+energies. You can always add a constant to the cohesive energies of
+respective structures. It is the difference in the cohesive energies
+of structures within the migration path, which determines the
+migration barrier.
+
+In fact, cohesive energies are most often well described by the
+classical potentials since these are most often used to fit the
+potential parameters.
+
+The overestimated migration barrier, however, is due to the short
+range character of the potential, which drops the interaction to
+zero within the first and next neighbor distance using a special
+cut-off function as explained in PRB 76, 224103 (2007). The
+overestimated barrier and slightly different pathway (however,
+starting and final configuration/orientation agree) is indeed
+demonstrated for the carbon interstitial within the present study.
+Since the reason of overestimation is inherent to the short range
+potential, migration pathways among other configurations are
+likewise overestimated.