From: hackbard <hackbard@hackdaworld.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:22:35 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: more intro +hk proof
X-Git-Url: https://hackdaworld.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9fac15a186e73cf587fb7d9dfa1c737c778cd08a;p=lectures%2Flatex.git

more intro +hk proof
---

diff --git a/physics_compact/intro.tex b/physics_compact/intro.tex
index 5771409..db3bf5c 100644
--- a/physics_compact/intro.tex
+++ b/physics_compact/intro.tex
@@ -3,5 +3,7 @@
 As the title suggests, the present work constitutes an attempt to summarize mathematical models and abstractions employed in modern theoretical physics.
 Focussed on solid state theory, which, however, requires a large amount of tools, the present book tries to additionally include all prerequisites in a hopefully compact way.
 
-A final remark: This is work in progress and might not be very usefull for the ...
+A final remark: This is work in progress.
+In the initial form, the manuscript will hardly contain pedagogically useful explanations but pure mathematical descriptions.
+Thus, it is considered my own personal leaflet rather than a general introduction to solid state theory.
 
diff --git a/physics_compact/solid.tex b/physics_compact/solid.tex
index 20ecfef..50df24d 100644
--- a/physics_compact/solid.tex
+++ b/physics_compact/solid.tex
@@ -27,21 +27,33 @@ Suppose two potentials $V_1$ and $V_2$ exist, which yield the same electron dens
 The corresponding Hamiltonians are denoted $H_1$ and $H_2$ with the respective ground-state wavefunctions $\Psi_1$ and $\Psi_2$ and eigenvalues $E_1$ and $E_2$.
 Then, due to the variational principle (see \ref{sec:var_meth}), one can write
 \begin{equation}
-E_1=\langle \Psi_1 | H_1 | \Psi_1 \rangle < \langle \Psi_2 | H_1 | \Psi_2 \rangle
+E_1=\langle \Psi_1 | H_1 | \Psi_1 \rangle <
+\langle \Psi_2 | H_1 | \Psi_2 \rangle \text{ .}
+\label{subsub:hk01}
 \end{equation}
-Expressing $H_1$ by $H_2+H_1-H_2$
+Expressing $H_1$ by $H_2+H_1-H_2$, the last part of \eqref{subsub:hk01} can be rewritten:
 \begin{equation}
 \langle \Psi_2 | H_1 | \Psi_2 \rangle =
 \langle \Psi_2 | H_2 | \Psi_2 \rangle +
 \langle \Psi_2 | H_1 -H_2 | \Psi_2 \rangle
 \end{equation}
-and the fact that the two Hamiltonians, which describe the same number of electrons, differ only in the potential
+The two Hamiltonians, which describe the same number of electrons, differ only in the potential
 \begin{equation}
 H_1-H_2=V_1(\vec{r})-V_2(\vec{r})
 \end{equation}
-one obtains
+and, thus
 \begin{equation}
 E_1<E2+\int n(\vec{r}) \left( V_1(\vec{r})-V_2(\vec{r}) \right) d\vec{r}
+\text{ .}
+\label{subsub:hk02}
 \end{equation}
-By switching the indices ...
+By switching the indices of \eqref{subsub:hk02} and adding the resulting equation to \eqref{subsub:hk02}, the contradiction
+\begin{equation}
+E_1 + E_2 < E_2 + E_1 +
+\underbrace{
+\int n(\vec{r}) \left( V_1(\vec{r})-V_2(\vec{r}) \right) d\vec{r} +
+\int n(\vec{r}) \left( V_2(\vec{r})-V_1(\vec{r}) \right) d\vec{r}
+}_{=0}
+\end{equation}
+is revealed.