X-Git-Url: https://hackdaworld.org/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=posic%2Fthesis%2Fdefects.tex;h=17fd7bcb31529641ca076a12d26911647fea35d2;hb=eb509e5b5ef4ede50aea14682fe1d6519be9340e;hp=2206dee5c1abba36a7a0049b0260b8c9861f2f80;hpb=2fa00b0623a6e75a295de13d4b6a1b948de3680a;p=lectures%2Flatex.git diff --git a/posic/thesis/defects.tex b/posic/thesis/defects.tex index 2206dee..17fd7bc 100644 --- a/posic/thesis/defects.tex +++ b/posic/thesis/defects.tex @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ Todo: To refine the migration barrier one has to find the saddle point structure \begin{figure}[h] \begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=13cm]{im_00-1_nosym_sp_fullct_thesis.ps}\\[0.5cm] +\includegraphics[width=13cm]{im_00-1_nosym_sp_fullct_thesis.ps}\\[1.5cm] \begin{picture}(0,0)(150,0) \includegraphics[width=2.5cm]{vasp_mig/00-1.eps} \end{picture} @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ In a second process 0.25 eV of energy are needed for the system to revert into a \begin{figure}[h] \begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=13cm]{vasp_mig/00-1_0-10_nosym_sp_fullct.ps}\\[0.5cm] +\includegraphics[width=13cm]{vasp_mig/00-1_0-10_nosym_sp_fullct.ps}\\[1.6cm] \begin{picture}(0,0)(140,0) \includegraphics[width=2.5cm]{vasp_mig/00-1_a.eps} \end{picture} @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ The resulting migration barrier of approximately 0.9 eV is very close to the exp \begin{figure}[h] \begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=13cm]{vasp_mig/00-1_ip0-10_nosym_sp_fullct.ps}\\[0.5cm] +\includegraphics[width=13cm]{vasp_mig/00-1_ip0-10_nosym_sp_fullct.ps}\\[1.8cm] \begin{picture}(0,0)(140,0) \includegraphics[width=2.2cm]{vasp_mig/00-1_b.eps} \end{picture} @@ -652,4 +652,71 @@ In addition the bond-ceneterd configuration, for which spin polarized calculatio \section{Combination of point defects} +The structural and energetic properties of combinations of point defects are investigated in the following. +The focus is on combinations of the \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell interstitial with a second defect. +The second defect is either another \hkl<1 0 0>-type interstitial occupying different orientations, a vacany or a substitutional carbon atom. +Several distances of the two defects are examined. +Investigations are restricted to quantum-mechanical calculations. +\begin{figure}[h] +\begin{center} +\begin{minipage}{7.5cm} +\includegraphics[width=7cm]{comb_pos.eps} +\end{minipage} +\begin{minipage}{6.0cm} +\underline{Positions given in $a_{\text{Si}}$}\\[0.3cm] +Initial interstitial: $\frac{1}{4}\hkl<1 1 1>$\\ +Relative silicon neighbour positions: +\begin{enumerate} + \item $\frac{1}{4}\hkl<1 1 -1>$, $\frac{1}{4}\hkl<-1 -1 -1>$ () + \item $\frac{1}{2}\hkl<1 0 1>$, $\frac{1}{2}\hkl<0 1 -1>$,\\[0.2cm] + $\frac{1}{2}\hkl<0 -1 -1>$, $\frac{1}{2}\hkl<-1 0 -1>$ + \item $\frac{1}{4}\hkl<1 -1 1>$, $\frac{1}{4}\hkl<-1 1 1>$ + \item $\frac{1}{4}\hkl<-1 1 -3>$, $\frac{1}{4}\hkl<1 -1 -3>$ + \item $\frac{1}{2}\hkl<-1 -1 0>$, $\frac{1}{2}\hkl<1 1 0>$ +\end{enumerate} +\end{minipage}\\ +\begin{picture}(0,0)(190,20) +\includegraphics[width=2.3cm]{100_arrow.eps} +\end{picture} +\begin{picture}(0,0)(220,0) +\includegraphics[height=2.2cm]{001_arrow.eps} +\end{picture} +\end{center} +\caption[\hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell interstitial defect and positions of next neighboured silicon atoms used for the second defect.]{\hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell interstitial defect and positions of next neighboured silicon atoms used for the second defect. Two possibilities exist for red numbered atoms and four possibilities exist for blue numbered atoms.} +\label{fig:defects:pos_of_comb} +\end{figure} +\begin{table}[h] +\begin{center} +\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} +\hline +\hline + & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ +\hline + \hkl<0 0 -1> & & & & & \\ + \hkl<0 0 1> & & & & & \\ + \hkl<0 -1 0> & & & & & \\ + \hkl<0 1 0> & & & & & \\ + \hkl<-1 0 0> & & & & & \\ + \hkl<1 0 0> & & & & & \\ + C substitutional & & & & & \\ + Vacancy & & & & & \\ +\hline +\hline +\end{tabular} +\end{center} +\caption[Energetic results of defect combinations.]{Energetic results of defect combinations. The given energies in eV are defined by equation \eqref{eq:defects:e_of_comb}.} +\label{tab:defects:e_of_comb} +\end{table} +Figure \ref{fig:defects:pos_of_comb} shows the initial \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell interstitial defect and the positions of next neighboured silicon atoms used for the second defect. +Table \ref{tab:defects:e_of_comb} summarizes energetic results obtained after relaxation of the defect combinations. +The energy of interest $E$ is defined to be +\begin{equation} +E= +E_{\text{f}}^{\text{defect combination}}- +E_{\text{f}}^{\text{C \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell}}- +E_{\text{f}}^{\text{2nd defect}} +\label{eq:defects:e_of_comb} +\end{equation} +with $E_{\text{f}}^{\text{defect combination}}$ being the formation energy of the defect combination, $E_{\text{f}}^{\text{C \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell}}$ being the formation energy of the C \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell interstitial defect and $E_{\text{f}}^{\text{2nd defect}}$ being the formation energy of the second defect. +