From: hackbard Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:14:56 +0000 (+0200) Subject: kai changes X-Git-Url: https://hackdaworld.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f1164d476d1ef8e52139dba8cede4949c7085f2b;p=lectures%2Flatex.git kai changes --- diff --git a/posic/publications/defect_combos.tex b/posic/publications/defect_combos.tex index 6329114..307e18a 100644 --- a/posic/publications/defect_combos.tex +++ b/posic/publications/defect_combos.tex @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ \author{F. Zirkelbach} \author{B. Stritzker} \affiliation{Experimentalphysik IV, Universit\"at Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany} -\author{K. Nordlund} -\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland} \author{J. K. N. Lindner} \author{W. G. Schmidt} \author{E. Rauls} @@ -156,11 +154,11 @@ Fig.~\ref{fig:sep_def} shows the obtained structures while the corresponding ene Ref.\cite{dal_pino93,capaz94} & - & - & - & - & - & 1.89\cite{dal_pino93} & x & - & x+2.1\cite{capaz94} \end{tabular} \end{ruledtabular} -\caption{Formation energies of silicon and carbon point defects in crystalline silicon given in electron Volt. T denotes the tetrahedral, H the hexagonal and BC the bond-centered interstitial configuration. V corresponds to the vacancy configuration. Dumbbell configurations are abbreviated by DB.} +\caption{Formation energies of silicon and carbon point defects in crystalline silicon given in eV. T denotes the tetrahedral, H the hexagonal and BC the bond-centered interstitial configuration. V corresponds to the vacancy configuration. Dumbbell configurations are abbreviated by DB.} \label{table:sep_eof} \end{table*} Results obtained by the present study compare well with results from literature\cite{leung99,al-mushadani03,dal_pino93,capaz94}. -Regarding intrinsic defects in Si, the \hkl<1 1 0> self-interstitial dumbbell (Si$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl<1 1 0> DB) is found to be the ground state configuration tersely followed by the hexagonal and tetrahedral configuration, which is consensus for Si$_{\text{i}}$\cite{leung99,al-mushadani03}. +Regarding intrinsic defects in Si, the \hkl<1 1 0> self-interstitial dumbbell (Si$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl<1 1 0> DB) is found to be the ground state configuration closely followed by the hexagonal and tetrahedral configuration, which is consensus for Si$_{\text{i}}$\cite{leung99,al-mushadani03}. In the case of a C impurity, next to the C$_{\text{s}}$ configuration, in which a C atom occupies an already vacant Si lattice site, the C \hkl<1 0 0> interstitial dumbbell (C$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl<1 0 0> DB) constitutes the energetically most favorable configuration, in which the C and Si dumbbell atoms share a regular Si lattice site. This finding is in agreement with several theoretical\cite{burnard93,leary97,dal_pino93,capaz94,jones04} and experimental\cite{watkins76,song90} investigations, which all predict this configuration to be the ground state. %However, to our best knowledge, no energy of formation for this type of defect based on first-principles calculations has yet been explicitly stated in literature. @@ -211,10 +209,10 @@ Table~\ref{table:dc_c-c} summarizes resulting binding energies for the combinati \hkl[1 0 0] & -2.25 & -2.16 & -0.10 & -0.27 & -1.38 & -0.06\\ \end{tabular} \end{ruledtabular} -\caption{Binding energies in electron Volt of C$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl<1 0 0>-type defect pairs. Equivalent configurations exhibit equal energies. Column 1 lists the orientation of the second defect, which is combined with the initial C$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl[0 0 -1] DB. The position index of the second defect is given in the first row according to Fig.~\ref{fig:combos}. R corresponds to the position located at $\frac{a_{\text{Si}}}{2}\hkl[3 2 3]$ relative to the initial defect position, which is the maximum realizable defect separation distance ($\approx \unit[1.3]{nm}$) due to periodic boundary conditions.} +\caption{Binding energies in eV of C$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl<1 0 0>-type defect pairs. Equivalent configurations exhibit equal energies. Column 1 lists the orientation of the second defect, which is combined with the initial C$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl[0 0 -1] DB. The position index of the second defect is given in the first row according to Fig.~\ref{fig:combos}. R corresponds to the position located at $\frac{a_{\text{Si}}}{2}\hkl[3 2 3]$ relative to the initial defect position, which is the maximum realizable defect separation distance ($\approx \unit[1.3]{nm}$) due to periodic boundary conditions.} \label{table:dc_c-c} \end{table} -Most of the obtained configurations result in binding energies well below zero indicating a preferable agglomeration of these type of defects. +Most of the obtained configurations result in binding energies well below zero indicating a preferable agglomeration of this type of defects. For increasing distances of the defect pair the binding energy approaches to zero (R in Table~\ref{table:dc_c-c}) as it is expected for non-interacting isolated defects. Energetically favorable and unfavorable configurations can be explained by stress compensation and increase respectively based on the resulting net strain of the respective configuration of the defect combination. Antiparallel orientations of the second defect, i.e. \hkl[0 0 1] for positions located below the \hkl(0 0 1) plane with respect to the initial one (positions 1, 2 and 4) form the energetically most unfavorable configurations. @@ -533,7 +531,7 @@ A quantitatively improved activation energy of \unit[0.9]{eV} for a qualitativel The investigation of defect pairs indicated a general trend of defect agglomeration mainly driven by the potential of strain reduction. Obtained results for the most part compare well with results gained in previous studies\cite{leary97,capaz98,mattoni2002,liu02} and show an astonishingly good agreement with experiment\cite{song90}. -For configurations involving two C impurities the ground state configurations have been found to to consist of C-C bonds, which are responsible for the vast gain in energy. +For configurations involving two C impurities the ground state configurations have been found to consist of C-C bonds, which are responsible for the vast gain in energy. However, based on investigations of possible migration pathways, these structures are less likely to arise than structures, in which both C atoms are interconnected by another Si atom, which is due to high activation energies of the respective pathways or alternative pathways featuring less high activation energies, which, however, involve intermediate unfavorable configurations. Thus, agglomeration of C$_{\text{i}}$ is expected while the formation of C-C bonds is assumed to fail to appear by thermally activated diffusion processes. @@ -553,7 +551,7 @@ These findings allow to draw conclusions on the mechanisms involved in the proce Agglomeration of C$_{\text{i}}$ is energetically favored and enabled by a low activation energy for migration. Although ion implantation is a process far from thermodynamic equilibrium, which might result in phases not described by the Si/C phase diagram, i.e. a C phase in Si, high activation energies are believed to be responsible for a low probability of the formation of C-C clusters. -Unrolling these findings on the initially stated controversy present in the precipitation model, an increased participation of C$_{\text{s}}$ already in the initial stage must be assumed due to its high probability of incidence. +In the context of the initially stated controversy present in the precipitation model, these findings suggest an increased participation of C$_{\text{s}}$ already in the initial stage due to its high probability of incidence. In addition, thermally activated, C$_{\text{i}}$ might turn into C$_{\text{s}}$. The associated emission of Si$_{\text{i}}$ serves two needs: as a vehicle for other C$_{\text{s}}$ atoms and as a supply of Si atoms needed elsewhere to form the SiC structure. As for the vehicle, Si$_{\text{i}}$ is believed to react with C$_{\text{s}}$ turning it into highly mobile C$_{\text{i}}$ again, allowing for the rearrangement of the C atom. @@ -592,6 +590,7 @@ Si$_{\text{i}}$ constitutes the vehicle for the rearrangement of C$_{\text{s}}$. % ---------------------------------------------------- \section*{Acknowledgment} We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung (Grant No. DPA-61/05) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant No. DFG SCHM 1361/11). +Prof. Kai Nordlund is greatly acknowledged for useful comments on the present manuscript. % --------------------------------- references -------------------