schmidt changes

[lectures/latex.git] / posic / publications / sic_prec_reply02.txt

diff --git a/posic/publications/sic_prec_reply02.txt b/posic/publications/sic_prec_reply02.txt
index 8734d3f..a7debe9 100644 (file)
--- a/posic/publications/sic_prec_reply02.txt
+++ b/posic/publications/sic_prec_reply02.txt
@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ thank you for the feedback to our submission.
 > response to all recommendations and criticisms.
 
 We decided to follow yours and the referee's suggestion to merge the
-two manuscripts in a single comprehensive manuscript.
+two manuscripts in a single comprehensive manuscript. Also, according
+to the referee's suggestions, some points were clarified and explained
+in more detail.
 
 Please find below the summary of changes and a detailed response to
 the recommendations of the referee.
@@ -147,23 +149,15 @@ interaction of defects was added (Change 8).
 > are seen for constant volume calculations (on a few simple
 > examples, say)?
 
-% Differences are supposed to be negligible small since only small
-% changes in volume are detected. However, in experiment, substrate
-% swelling is observed. Thus, to allow for full relaxation, simulations
-% were performed in the NpT ensemble. However, for the above-mentioned
-% reason, no fundamental differences are expected for single defect
-% configurations in the canonical and isothermal-isobaric ensemble with
-% respect to energy.
-
 In experiment, substrate swelling is observed for high-dose carbon
 implantation into silicon. Indeed, for a single defect, the change in
 volume is less than 0.2% in simulation. Due to this, results of single
-defects within an isothermal-isobaric simulation are expected to not
-drastically differ to results of constant volume simulations. Based on the
-experimentally observed change in volume for high-dose carbon
+defects within an isothermal-isobaric simulation are not expected to
+differ drastically to results of constant volume simulations. Based on
+the experimentally observed change in volume for high-dose carbon
 implantations, however, the respective relaxation is allowed for in
-simulation for both, single defect calulations as well as the high carbon
-concentration simulations.
+simulation for both, single defect calulations as well as the high
+carbon concentration simulations.
 
 A respective statement was added to the methodology section
 (Change 4).
@@ -305,12 +299,12 @@ Description:
 + = line added
 - = line removed
 
-Change 1: added/merged parts of the Abstract of BA11443
+Change 1: added/merged parts of 'Abstract' of BA11443
 
  from:  These aime to clarify ...
  until: Finally, results of the ...
 
-Change 2: added/merged parts of the Introduction of BA11443
+Change 2: added/merged parts of 'Introduction' of BA11443
 
  from:  A lot of theoretical work has been done ...
  until: However, investigations are, first of all, ... 
@@ -355,12 +349,12 @@ Change 7: CRT not necessarily predicts the minimum energy path
  structures.
 
 Change 8: added definition and explanation of the binding energy to
-          the methodology section
+          the 'Methodology' section
 
  from:  The binding energy of a defect pair ...
  until: The interaction strength, i.e. the ...
 
-Change 9: removed Results section
+Change 9: removed 'Results' section
 
 Change 10: added 'Comparison of classical potential and
            first-principles methods' section