X-Git-Url: https://hackdaworld.org/gitweb/?p=lectures%2Flatex.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=posic%2Fthesis%2Fdefects.tex;h=c0acc816889018b9d9c6fee2a57daa31b63c64b7;hp=65cae0f540f1d296e6995dfa44977fd47cacdba9;hb=9d12247bb6a9386ad3c0d8cc5a7ff61e9d2b7350;hpb=3c03feee61017489bbd7bbc612a730de6f43b304

diff --git a/posic/thesis/defects.tex b/posic/thesis/defects.tex
index 65cae0f..c0acc81 100644
--- a/posic/thesis/defects.tex
+++ b/posic/thesis/defects.tex
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ In the present study, a further relaxation of this defect structure is observed.
 The C atom of the second and the Si atom of the initial DB move towards each other forming a bond, which results in a somewhat lower binding energy of \unit[-2.25]{eV}.
 The corresponding defect structure is displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:defects:225}.
 In this configuration the initial Si and C DB atoms are displaced along \hkl[1 0 0] and \hkl[-1 0 0] in such a way that the Si atom is forming tetrahedral bonds with two Si and two C atoms.
-The C and Si atom constituting the second defect are as well displaced in such a way, that the C atom forms tetrahedral bonds with four Si neighbors, a configuration expected in SiC.
+The C and Si atom constituting the second defect are as well displaced in such a way that the C atom forms tetrahedral bonds with four Si neighbors, a configuration expected in SiC.
 The two carbon atoms, which are spaced by \unit[2.70]{\AA}, do not form a bond but anyhow reside in a shorter distance than expected in SiC.
 Si atom number 2 is pushed towards the C atom, which results in the breaking of the bond to Si atom number 4.
 Breaking of the $\sigma$ bond is indeed confirmed by investigating the charge density isosurface of this configuration.
@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ Instead, the Si atom forms a bond with the initial \ci{} and the second C atom f
 The C atoms are spaced by \unit[3.14]{\AA}, which is very close to the expected C-C next neighbor distance of \unit[3.08]{\AA} in SiC.
 Figure~\ref{fig:defects:205} displays the results of a \hkl[0 0 1] DB inserted at position 3.
 The binding energy is \unit[-2.05]{eV}.
-Both DBs are tilted along the same direction remaining aligned in parallel and the second DB is pushed downwards in such a way, that the four DB atoms form a rhomboid.
+Both DBs are tilted along the same direction remaining aligned in parallel and the second DB is pushed downwards in such a way that the four DB atoms form a rhomboid.
 Both C atoms form tetrahedral bonds to four Si atoms.
 However, Si atom number 1 and number 3, which are bound to the second \ci{} atom are also bound to the initial C atom.
 These four atoms of the rhomboid reside in a plane and, thus, do not match the situation in SiC.
@@ -1229,7 +1229,7 @@ For the same reasons as in the last subsection, structures other than the ground
 %In case a) only the first displacement is compensated by the substitutional carbon atom.
 %This results in a somewhat higher binding energy of -0.51 eV.
 %The binding energy gets even higher in case b) ($E_{\text{b}}=-0.15\text{ eV}$), in which the substitutional carbon is located further away from the initial dumbbell.
-%In both cases, silicon atom number 1 is displaced in such a way, that the bond to silicon atom number 5 vanishes.
+%In both cases, silicon atom number 1 is displaced in such a way that the bond to silicon atom number 5 vanishes.
 %In case of~\ref{fig:defects:comb_db_04} a) the carbon atoms form a bond with a distance of 1.5 \AA, which is close to the C-C distance expected in diamond or graphit.
 %Both carbon atoms are highly attracted by each other resulting in large displacements and high strain energy in the surrounding.
 %A binding energy of 0.26 eV is observed.