From ec406716f5dd60384a4b670abdd1f712ef3c8207 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hackbard Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:43:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] em corrected --- posic/thesis/defects.tex | 12 ++++++------ posic/thesis/md.tex | 2 +- posic/thesis/summary_outlook.tex | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/posic/thesis/defects.tex b/posic/thesis/defects.tex index 8dd42a5..16a42e9 100644 --- a/posic/thesis/defects.tex +++ b/posic/thesis/defects.tex @@ -796,8 +796,8 @@ The evolution of structure and configurational energy is displayed again in Fig. Approximately \unit[2.2]{eV} are needed to turn the \ci{} \hkl[0 0 -1] into the \hkl[1 1 0] DB located at the neighbored lattice site in \hkl[1 1 -1] direction. Another barrier of \unit[0.90]{eV} exists for the rotation into the \ci{} \hkl[0 -1 0] DB configuration for the path obtained with a time constant of \unit[100]{fs} for the Berendsen thermostat. Roughly the same amount would be necessary to excite the C$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl[1 1 0] DB to the BC configuration (\unit[0.40]{eV}) and a successive migration into the \hkl[0 0 1] DB configuration (\unit[0.50]{eV}) as displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:defects:110_mig} and Fig. \ref{fig:defects:cp_bc_00-1_mig}. -The former diffusion process, however, would more nicely agree with the ab initio path, since the migration is accompanied by a rotation of the DB orientation. -By considering a two step process and assuming equal preexponential factors for both diffusion steps, the probability of the total diffusion event is given by $\exp(\frac{\unit[2.24]{eV}+\unit[0.90]{eV}}{k_{\text{B}}T})$, which corresponds to a single diffusion barrier that is 3.5 times higher than the barrier obtained by {em ab initio} calculations. +The former diffusion process, however, would more nicely agree with the {\em ab initio} path, since the migration is accompanied by a rotation of the DB orientation. +By considering a two step process and assuming equal preexponential factors for both diffusion steps, the probability of the total diffusion event is given by $\exp(\frac{\unit[2.24]{eV}+\unit[0.90]{eV}}{k_{\text{B}}T})$, which corresponds to a single diffusion barrier that is 3.5 times higher than the barrier obtained by {\em ab initio} calculations. \subsection{Conclusions} @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ Although the C-C bond exhibiting a distance of \unit[0.15]{nm} close to the dist Again a single bond switch, i.e. the breaking of the bond of the Si atom bound to the fourfold coordinated C$_{\text{s}}$ atom and the formation of a double bond between the two C atoms, results in configuration b. The two C atoms form a \hkl[1 0 0] DB sharing the initial C$_{\text{s}}$ lattice site while the initial Si DB atom occupies its previously regular lattice site. The transition is accompanied by a large gain in energy as can be seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:026-128}, making it the ground-state configuration of a C$_{\text{s}}$ and C$_{\text{i}}$ DB in Si yet \unit[0.33]{eV} lower in energy than configuration B. -This finding is in good agreement with a combined ab initio and experimental study of Liu et~al.~\cite{liu02}, who first proposed this structure as the ground state identifying an energy difference compared to configuration B of \unit[0.2]{eV}. +This finding is in good agreement with a combined {\em ab initio} and experimental study of Liu et~al.~\cite{liu02}, who first proposed this structure as the ground state identifying an energy difference compared to configuration B of \unit[0.2]{eV}. % mattoni: A favored by 0.2 eV - NO! (again, missing spin polarization?) A net magnetization of two spin up electrons, which are equally localized as in the Si$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl<1 0 0> DB structure is observed. In fact, these two configurations are very similar and are qualitatively different from the C$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl<1 0 0> DB that does not show magnetization but a nearly collinear bond of the C DB atom to its two neighbored Si atoms while the Si DB atom approximates \unit[120]{$^{\circ}$} angles in between its bonds. @@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@ Thus, the existence of C$_{\text{s}}$ is very likely. Similar to what was previously mentioned, configurations of C$_{\text{s}}$ and a Si$_{\text{i}}$ DB might be particularly important at higher temperatures due to the low activation energy necessary for its formation. At higher temperatures, the contribution of entropy to structural formation increases, which might result in a spatial separation even for defects located within the capture radius. -Indeed, an {em ab initio} MD run at \unit[900]{$^{\circ}$C} starting from configuration \RM{1}, which -- based on the above findings -- is assumed to recombine into the ground state configuration, results in a separation of the C$_{\text{s}}$ and Si$_{\text{i}}$ DB by more than 4 neighbor distances realized in a repeated migration mechanism of annihilating and arising Si$_{\text{i}}$ DBs. +Indeed, an {\em ab initio} MD run at \unit[900]{$^{\circ}$C} starting from configuration \RM{1}, which -- based on the above findings -- is assumed to recombine into the ground state configuration, results in a separation of the C$_{\text{s}}$ and Si$_{\text{i}}$ DB by more than 4 neighbor distances realized in a repeated migration mechanism of annihilating and arising Si$_{\text{i}}$ DBs. The atomic configurations for two different points in time are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:defects:md}. \begin{figure}[tp] \begin{center} @@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@ $t=\unit[2900]{fs}$ \end{center} \end{minipage} \end{center} -\caption[Atomic configurations of an ab initio molecular dynamics run at {\unit[900]{$^{\circ}$C}} starting from a configuration of C$_{\text{s}}$ located next to a Si$_{\text{i}}$ {\hkl[1 1 0]} DB.]{Atomic configurations of an ab initio molecular dynamics run at \unit[900]{$^{\circ}$C} starting from a configuration of C$_{\text{s}}$ located next to a Si$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl[1 1 0] DB (atoms 1 and 2). Equal atoms are marked by equal numbers. For substantial atoms, bonds are drawn in red color.} +\caption[Atomic configurations of an {\em ab initio} molecular dynamics run at {\unit[900]{$^{\circ}$C}} starting from a configuration of C$_{\text{s}}$ located next to a Si$_{\text{i}}$ {\hkl[1 1 0]} DB.]{Atomic configurations of an {\em ab initio} molecular dynamics run at \unit[900]{$^{\circ}$C} starting from a configuration of C$_{\text{s}}$ located next to a Si$_{\text{i}}$ \hkl[1 1 0] DB (atoms 1 and 2). Equal atoms are marked by equal numbers. For substantial atoms, bonds are drawn in red color.} \label{fig:defects:md} \end{figure} Si atoms 1 and 2, which form the initial DB, occupy Si lattice sites in the final configuration while Si atom 3 is transferred from a regular lattice site into the interstitial lattice. @@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ The respective configurational energies are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:defects:si_mi \caption[Migration barrier of the \si{} {\hkl[1 1 0]} DB into the hexagonal and tetrahedral configuration as well as the hexagonal \si{} to tetrahedral \si{} transition.]{Migration barrier of the \si{} \hkl[1 1 0] DB into the hexagonal (H) and tetrahedral (T) configuration as well as the hexagonal \si{} to tetrahedral \si{} transition.} \label{fig:defects:si_mig2} \end{figure} -The obtained activation energies are of the same order of magnitude than values derived from other ab initio studies \cite{bloechl93,sahli05}. +The obtained activation energies are of the same order of magnitude than values derived from other {\em ab initio} studies \cite{bloechl93,sahli05}. The low barriers indeed enable configurations of further separated \cs{} and \si{} atoms by the highly mobile \si{} atom departing from the \cs{} defect as observed in the previously discussed MD simulation. % kept for nostalgical reason! diff --git a/posic/thesis/md.tex b/posic/thesis/md.tex index caa4fc3..b9f786c 100644 --- a/posic/thesis/md.tex +++ b/posic/thesis/md.tex @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ IBS studies revealed increased implantation temperatures to be more efficient th In particular, the restructuring of strong C-C bonds is affected \cite{deguchi92}. These bonds preferentially arise if additional kinetic energy provided by an increase of the implantation temperature is missing to accelerate or even enable atomic rearrangements. This is assumed to be related to the problem of slow structural evolution encountered in the high C concentration simulations. -The insertion of high amounts of C into a small volume within a short period of time resulting in essentially no time for the system to rearrange. +The insertion of high amounts of C into a small volume within a short period of time results in essentially no time for the system to rearrange. % rt implantation + annealing Furthermore, C implanted at room temperature was found to be able to migrate towards the surface and form C-rich clusters in contrast to implantations at elevated temperatures, which form stable epitaxially aligned 3C-SiC precipitates \cite{serre95}. In simulation, low temperatures result in configurations of highly mobile \ci{} \hkl<1 0 0> DBs whereas elevated temperatures show configurations of \cs{}, which constitute an extremely stable configuration that is unlikely to migrate. diff --git a/posic/thesis/summary_outlook.tex b/posic/thesis/summary_outlook.tex index 84d10f5..8b6a6db 100644 --- a/posic/thesis/summary_outlook.tex +++ b/posic/thesis/summary_outlook.tex @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The actual structure is equal to the tetrahedral configuration, which is slightl Variations exist with displacements along two or a single \hkl<1 0 0> direction indicating a potential artifact. However, finite temperature simulations are not affected by this artifact due to a low activation energy necessary for a transition into the energetically more favorable tetrahedral configuration. Next to the known problem of the underestimated formation energy of the tetrahedral configuration \cite{tersoff90}, the energetic sequence of the defect structures is well reproduced by the EA calculations. -Migration barriers of \si{} investigated by quantum-mechanical calculations are found to be of the same order of magnitude than values derived in other ab initio studies \cite{bloechl93,sahli05}. +Migration barriers of \si{} investigated by quantum-mechanical calculations are found to be of the same order of magnitude than values derived in other {\em ab initio} studies \cite{bloechl93,sahli05}. Defects of C in Si are well described by both methods. The \ci{} \hkl<1 0 0> DB is found to constitute the most favorable interstitial configuration in agreement with several theoretical \cite{burnard93,leary97,dal_pino93,capaz94,jones04} and experimental \cite{watkins76,song90} investigations. -- 2.20.1