+in the following, structures and formation energies
+of silicon self-interstitial defects are shown.
+the classical potential and ab initio method predicts formation energies,
+which are within the same order of magnitude.
+however, discrepancies exist.
+quantum-mechanical results reveal the silicon 110 interstitial dumbbell (db)
+as the ground state closely followed by the hexagonal and tetrahedral
+configuration, which is the consensus view for silicon interstitials.
+in contrast, the ea potential favors the tetrahedral configuration,
+a known problem, which arises due to the cut-off
+underestimating the closely located second next neighbors.
+the hexagonal defect is not stable
+opposed to results of the authors of the potential.
+first, it seems to condense at the hexagonal site but suddenly
+begins to move towards a more favoarble position,
+close to the tetrahedral one but slightly displaced along all 3 coordinate axes.
+this energy is equal to the formation energy given in the original work.
+this artificial configuration, however, turns out to have negligible influence
+in finite temperature simulations due to a low migration barrier into the
+tetrahedral configuration.
+nevertheless, these artificats have to be taken into account
+in the following investigations of defect combinations.