+\begin{figure}[t!h!]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{5cm}
+a) \underline{$E_{\text{b}}=-2.16\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{00-1dc/2-16.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{5cm}
+b) \underline{$E_{\text{b}}=-1.90\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{00-1dc/1-90.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{5cm}
+c) \underline{$E_{\text{b}}=-2.05\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{00-1dc/2-05.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Relaxed structures of defect complexes obtained by creating a a) \hkl<1 0 0> and b) \hkl<0 1 0> dumbbell at position 2 and a c) \hkl<0 0 1> dumbbel at position 3.}
+\label{fig:defects:comb_db_02}
+\end{figure}
+Figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_02} shows the next three most energetically favorable configurations.
+The relaxed configuration obtained by creating a second \hkl<1 0 0> dumbbell at position 2 is shown in figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_02} a).
+A binding energy of -2.16 eV is observed.
+After relaxation the second dumbbell is aligned along \hkl<1 1 0>.
+The bond of the silicon atoms 1 and 2 does not persist.
+Instead the silicon atom forms a bond with the initial carbon interstitial and the second carbon atom forms a bond with silicon atom 1 forming four bonds in total.
+The carbon atoms are spaced by 3.14 \AA, which is very close to the expected C-C next neighbour distance of 3.08 \AA{} in silicon carbide.
+Figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_02} c) displays the results of another \hkl<0 0 1> dumbbell inserted at position 3.
+The binding energy is -2.05 eV.
+Both dumbbells are tilted along the same direction remaining parallely aligned and the second dumbbell is pushed downwards in such a way, that the four dumbbell atoms form a rhomboid.
+Both carbon atoms form tetrahedral bonds to four silicon atoms.
+However, silicon atom 1 and 3, which are bond to the second carbon dumbbell interstitial are also bond to the initial carbon atom.
+These four atoms of the rhomboid reside in a plane and, thus, do not match the situation in silicon carbide.
+The carbon atoms have a distance of 2.75 \AA.
+In figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_02} b) a second \hkl<0 1 0> dumbbell is constructed at position 2.
+An energy of -1.90 eV is observed.
+The initial dumbbell and especially the carbon atom is pushed towards the silicon atom of the second dumbbell forming an additional fourth bond.
+Silicon atom number 1 is pulled towards the carbon atoms of the dumbbells accompanied by the disappearance of its bond to silicon number 5 as well as the bond of silicon number 5 to its next neighboured silicon atom in \hkl<1 1 -1> direction.
+The carbon atom of the second dumbbell forms threefold coordinated bonds to its silicon neighbours.
+A distance of 2.80 \AA{} is observed for the two carbon atoms.
+Again, the two carbon atoms and its two interconnecting silicon atoms form a rhomboid.
+C-C distances of 2.70 to 2.80 \AA{} seem to be characteristic for such configurations, in which the carbon atoms and the two interconnecting silicon atoms reside in a plane.
+
+Configurations obtained by adding a second dumbbell interstitial at position 4 are characterized by minimal changes from their initial creation condition during relaxation.
+There is a low interaction of the dumbbells, which seem to exist independent of each other.
+This, on the one hand, becomes evident by investigating the final structure, in which both of the dumbbells essentially retain the structure expected for a single dumbbell and on the other hand is supported by the observed binding energies which vary only slightly around zero.
+This low interaction is due to the larger distance and a missing direct connection by bonds along a crystallographic direction.
+Both carbon and silicon atoms of the dumbbells form threefold coordinated bonds to their next neighbours.
+The energetically most unfavorable configuration ($E_{\text{b}}=0.26\text{ eV}$) is obtained for the \hkl<0 0 1> interstitial oppositely orientated to the initial one.
+A dumbbell taking the same orientation as the initial one is less unfavorble ($E_{\text{b}}=0.04\text{ eV}$).
+Both configurations are unfavorable compared to far-off isolated dumbbells.
+Nonparallel orientations, that is the \hkl<0 1 0>, \hkl<0 -1 0> and its equivalents, result in binding energies of -0.12 eV and -0.27 eV, thus, constituting energetically favorable configurations.
+The reduction of strain energy is higher in the second case where the carbon atom of the second dumbbell is placed in the direction pointing away from the initial carbon atom.
+
+\begin{figure}[t!h!]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+a) \underline{$E_{\text{b}}=-1.53\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/1-53.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+b) \underline{$E_{\text{b}}=-1.66\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/1-66.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}\\[0.2cm]
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+c) \underline{$E_{\text{b}}=-1.88\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/1-88.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+d) \underline{$E_{\text{b}}=-1.38\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/1-38.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Relaxed structures of defect complexes obtained by creating a a) \hkl<0 0 1>, a b) \hkl<0 0 -1>, a c) \hkl<0 -1 0> and a d) \hkl<1 0 0> dumbbell at position 5.}
+\label{fig:defects:comb_db_03}
+\end{figure}
+Energetically beneficial configurations of defect complexes are observed for second interstititals of all orientations placed at position 5, a position two bonds away from the initial interstitial along the \hkl<1 1 0> direction.
+Relaxed structures of these complexes are displayed in figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_03}.
+Figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_03} a) and b) show the relaxed structures of \hkl<0 0 1> and \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbells.
+The upper dumbbell atoms are pushed towards each other forming fourfold coordinated bonds.
+While the displacements of the silicon atoms in case b) are symmetric to the \hkl(1 1 0) plane, in case a) the silicon atom of the initial dumbbel is pushed a little further in the direction of the carbon atom of the second dumbbell than the carbon atom is pushed towards the silicon atom.
+The bottom atoms of the dumbbells remain in threefold coordination.
+The symmetric configuration is energetically more favorable ($E_{\text{b}}=-1.66\text{ eV}$) since the displacements of the atoms is less than in the antiparallel case ($E_{\text{b}}=-1.53\text{ eV}$).
+In figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_03} c) and d) the nonparallel orientations, namely the \hkl<0 -1 0> and \hkl<1 0 0> dumbbells are shown.
+Binding energies of -1.88 eV and -1.38 eV are obtained for the relaxed structures.
+In both cases the silicon atom of the initial interstitial is pulled towards the near by atom of the second dumbbell so that both atoms form fourfold coordinated bonds to their next neighbours.
+In case c) it is the carbon and in case d) the silicon atom of the second interstitial which forms the additional bond with the silicon atom of the initial interstitial.
+The atom of the second dumbbell, the carbon atom of the initial dumbbell and the two interconnecting silicon atoms again reside in a plane.
+A typical C-C distance of 2.79 \AA{} is, thus, observed for case c).
+The far-off atom of the second dumbbell resides in threefold coordination.
+
+Assuming that it is possible for the system to minimize free energy by an in place reorientation of the dumbbell at any position the minimum energy orientation of dumbbells along the \hkl<1 1 0> direction and the resulting C-C distance is shown in table \ref{tab:defects:comb_db110}.
+\begin{table}[t!h!]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c}
+\hline
+\hline
+ & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6\\
+\hline
+$E_{\text{b}}$ [eV] & -2.39 & -1.88 & -0.59 & -0.31 & -0.24 & -0.21 \\
+C-C distance [\AA] & 1.4 & 4.6 & 6.5 & 8.6 & 10.5 & 10.8 \\
+Type & \hkl<-1 0 0> & \hkl<1 0 0> & \hkl<1 0 0> & \hkl<1 0 0> & \hkl<1 0 0> & \hkl<1 0 0>, \hkl<0 -1 0>\\
+\hline
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Binding energy and type of the minimum energy configuration of an additional dumbbell with respect to the separation distance in bonds along the \hkl<1 1 0> direction and the C-C distance.}
+\label{tab:defects:comb_db110}
+\end{table}
+\begin{figure}[t!h!]
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=12.5cm]{db_along_110.ps}\\
+\includegraphics[width=12.5cm]{db_along_110_cc.ps}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Minimum binding energy of dumbbell combinations with respect to the separation distance in bonds along \hkl<1 1 0> and C-C distance.}
+\label{fig:defects:comb_db110}
+\end{figure}
+Figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db110} shows the corresponding plot of the data including a cubic spline interplation and a suitable fitting curve.
+The funtion found most suitable for curve fitting is $f(x)=a/x^3$ comprising the single fit parameter $a$.
+Thus, far-off located dumbbells show an interaction proportional to the reciprocal cube of the distance and the amount of bonds along \hkl<1 1 0> respectively.
+This behavior is no longer valid for the immediate vicinity revealed by the saturating binding energy of a second dumbbell at position 1, which is ignored in the fitting procedure.
+{\color{red}Todo: DB mig along 110?}
+
+\begin{figure}[t!h!]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{5cm}
+a) \underline{Pos: 1, $E_{\text{b}}=0.26\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{00-1dc/0-26.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{5cm}
+b) \underline{Pos: 3, $E_{\text{b}}=-0.93\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{00-1dc/0-93.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{5cm}
+c) \underline{Pos: 5, $E_{\text{b}}=0.49\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{00-1dc/0-49.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Relaxed structures of defect complexes obtained by creating a carbon substitutional at position 1 (a)), 3 (b)) and 5 (c)).}
+\label{fig:defects:comb_db_04}
+\end{figure}
+\begin{figure}[t!h!]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+a) \underline{Pos: 2, $E_{\text{b}}=-0.51\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6cm]{00-1dc/0-51.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+b) \underline{Pos: 4, $E_{\text{b}}=-0.15\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6cm]{00-1dc/0-15.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Relaxed structures of defect complexes obtained by creating a carbon substitutional at position 2 (a)) and 4 (b)).}
+\label{fig:defects:comb_db_05}
+\end{figure}
+The second part of table \ref{tab:defects:e_of_comb} lists the energetic results of substitutional carbon and vacancy combinations with the initial \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell.
+Figures \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_04} and \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_05} show relaxed structures of substitutional carbon in combination with the \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell for several positions.
+In figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_04} positions 1 (a)), 3 (b)) and 5 (c)) are displayed.
+A substituted carbon atom at position 5 results in an energetically extremely unfavorable configuration.
+Both carbon atoms, the substitutional and the dumbbell atom, pull silicon atom number 1 towards their own location regarding the \hkl<1 1 0> direction.
+Due to this a large amount of tensile strain energy is needed, which explains the high positive value of 0.49 eV.
+The lowest binding energy is observed for a substitutional carbon atom inserted at position 3.
+The substitutional carbon atom is located above the dumbbell substituting a silicon atom which would usually be bound to and displaced along \hkl<0 0 1> and \hkl<1 1 0> by the silicon dumbbell atom.
+In contrast to the previous configuration strain compensation occurs resulting in a binding energy as low as -0.93 eV.
+Substitutional carbon at position 2 and 4, visualized in figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_05}, is located below the initial dumbbell.
+Silicon atom number 1, which is bound to the interstitial carbon atom is displaced along \hkl<0 0 -1> and \hkl<-1 -1 0>.
+In case a) only the first displacement is compensated by the substitutional carbon atom.
+This results in a somewhat higher binding energy of -0.51 eV.
+The binding energy gets even higher in case b) ($E_{\text{b}}=-0.15\text{ eV}$), in which the substitutional carbon is located further away from the initial dumbbell.
+In both cases, silicon atom number 1 is displaced in such a way, that the bond to silicon atom number 5 vanishes.
+In case of \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_04} a) the carbon atoms form a bond with a distance of 1.5 \AA, which is close to the C-C distance expected in diamond or graphit.
+Both carbon atoms are highly attracted by each other resulting in large displacements and high strain energy in the surrounding.
+A binding energy of 0.26 eV is observed.
+Substitutional carbon at positions 2, 3 and 5 are the energetically most favorable configurations and constitute promising starting points for SiC precipitation.
+On the one hand, C-C distances around 3.1 \AA{} exist for substitution positions 2 and 3, which are close to the C-C distance expected in silicon carbide.
+On the other hand stretched silicon carbide is obtained by the transition of the silicon dumbbell atom into a silicon self-interstitial located somewhere in the silicon host matrix and th etransition of the carbon dumbbell atom into another substitutional atom occupying the dumbbell lattice site.
+
+\begin{figure}[t!h!]
+\begin{center}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+a) \underline{Pos: 2, $E_{\text{b}}=-0.59\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/0-59.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+b) \underline{Pos: 3, $E_{\text{b}}=-3.14\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/3-14.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}\\[0.2cm]
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+c) \underline{Pos: 4, $E_{\text{b}}=-0.54\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/0-54.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\begin{minipage}[t]{7cm}
+d) \underline{Pos: 5, $E_{\text{b}}=-0.50\text{ eV}$}
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{00-1dc/0-50.eps}
+\end{center}
+\end{minipage}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Relaxed structures of defect complexes obtained by creating vacancies at positions 2 (a)), 3 (b)), 4 (c)) and 5 (d)).}
+\label{fig:defects:comb_db_06}
+\end{figure}
+Figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_06} displays relaxed structures of vacancies in combination with the \hkl<0 0 -1> dumbbell interstital.
+The creation of a vacancy at position 1 results in a configuration of substitutional carbon on a silicon lattice site and no other remaining defects.
+The carbon dumbbell atom moves to position 1 where the vacancy is created and the silicon dumbbell atom recaptures the dumbbell lattice site.
+With a binding energy of -5.39 eV, this is the energetically most favorable configuration observed.
+A great amount of strain energy is reduced by removing the silicon atom at position 3, which is illustrated in figure \ref{fig:defects:comb_db_06} b).
+The dumbbell structure shifts towards the position of the vacancy which replaces the silicon atom usually bond to and at the same time strained by the silicon dumbbell atom.
+Due to the displacement into the \hkl<1 -1 0> direction the bond of the dumbbell silicon atom to the silicon atom on the top left breaks and instead forms a bond to the silicon atom located in \hkl<1 -1 1> direction which is not shown in the figure.
+A binding energy of -3.14 eV is obtained for this structure composing another energetically favorable configuration.
+
+Vacancies created at positions 2 and 4 have similar