final version?

diff --git a/posic/talks/defense.tex b/posic/talks/defense.tex
index e8f2788f679513e68cea4699eafb953f902a8e33..e800d602821e01d76796c1ca05bb1530d901323e 100644 (file)
--- a/posic/talks/defense.tex
+++ b/posic/talks/defense.tex
@@ -1034,17 +1034,23 @@ Note: Change in orientation
 {\bf\boldmath Combinations of \hkl<1 0 0>-type interstitials}\\[0.2cm]
 \begin{minipage}[t]{3.2cm}
 \underline{\hkl[1 0 0] at position 1}\\[0.1cm]
+{\color{cyan}
+\framebox{
 \includegraphics[width=2.8cm]{00-1dc/2-25.eps}
+}}
 \end{minipage}
 \begin{minipage}[t]{3.0cm}
 \underline{\hkl[0 -1 0] at position 1}\\[0.1cm]
-\includegraphics[width=2.8cm]{00-1dc/2-39.eps}
+{\color{orange}
+\framebox{
+\includegraphics[width=2.5cm]{00-1dc/2-39.eps}
+}}
 \end{minipage}
 \begin{minipage}[t]{6.1cm}
 \vspace{0.7cm}
 \begin{itemize}
  \item \ci{} agglomeration energetically favorable
- \item Most favorable: C clustering\\
+ \item Most favorable: strong C-C bond\\
        {\color{red}However \ldots}\\
         \ldots high migration barrier ($>4\,\text{eV}$)\\
         \ldots entropy:
@@ -1105,11 +1111,17 @@ Note: Change in orientation
 {\bf\boldmath Combinations of \hkl<1 0 0>-type interstitials}\\[0.2cm]
 \begin{minipage}[t]{3.2cm}
 \underline{\hkl[1 0 0] at position 1}\\[0.1cm]
+{\color{cyan}
+\framebox{
 \includegraphics[width=2.8cm]{00-1dc/2-25.eps}
+}}
 \end{minipage}
 \begin{minipage}[t]{3.0cm}
 \underline{\hkl[0 -1 0] at position 1}\\[0.1cm]
-\includegraphics[width=2.8cm]{00-1dc/2-39.eps}
+{\color{orange}
+\framebox{
+\includegraphics[width=2.5cm]{00-1dc/2-39.eps}
+}}
 \end{minipage}
 \begin{minipage}[t]{6.1cm}
 \vspace{0.7cm}

diff --git a/posic/talks/defense.txt b/posic/talks/defense.txt
index e416b258c6fbd6b29445865e069f6c865e6811ef..d0306215b142d3207d35a2d0dbef177c4e5f6007 100644 (file)
--- a/posic/talks/defense.txt
+++ b/posic/talks/defense.txt
@@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ this suggests that agglomeration of Ci indeed is expected, but no C clustering.
 
 slide 13
 
-this is reinforced by the plot of the binding energy of Ci dbs
+this is reinforced by the plot of the binding energy of dumbbells
 separated along the 110 direction.
 a capture radius clearly exceeding 1 nm is observed.
 however, the interpolated graph suggests the disappearance of attractive forces
-between the two lowest separation distances of the defects.
+between the two lowest separation distances.
 
 this supports the assumption of C agglomeration and the absence of C clustering.